mirror of
https://github.com/titanscouting/tra-analysis.git
synced 2024-11-14 23:26:18 +00:00
228 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
228 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
# Modelo.js [](https://travis-ci.org/kevinconway/Modelo.js)
|
|
|
|
**A multiple inheritance utility for JavaScript.**
|
|
|
|
## Why?
|
|
|
|
Inheritance libraries today all seem to enforce the same clunky interface
|
|
style. The only one of any merit these days is 'util.inherits' from the Node.js
|
|
standard library. Only problem: no multiple inheritance.
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't it be great if 'util.inherits' supported multiple inheritance *and*
|
|
it stayed fast too?
|
|
|
|
That's this library. That's why it exists.
|
|
|
|
## util.inherits
|
|
|
|
The 'modelo.inherits' function can act as a drop in replacement for
|
|
'util.inherits'. Already have a code base that you want to start extending? No
|
|
problem.
|
|
|
|
```javascript
|
|
|
|
var modelo = require('modelo');
|
|
|
|
function Base() {
|
|
// Base object constructor
|
|
}
|
|
Base.prototype.baseMethod = function baseMethod() {
|
|
console.log('Method from base object.');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function Extension() {
|
|
// Sub-object constructor
|
|
}
|
|
// util.inherits(Extension, Base);
|
|
modelo.inherits(Example, Base);
|
|
|
|
new Extension() instanceof Base; // true
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Multiple Inheritance
|
|
|
|
Once you need to extend multiple base objects, just put more base objects in
|
|
the call to 'inherits'.
|
|
|
|
```javascript
|
|
|
|
var modelo = require('modelo');
|
|
|
|
function MixinOne() {}
|
|
function MixinTwo() {}
|
|
|
|
function Combined() {}
|
|
modelo.inherits(Combined, MixinOne, MixinTwo);
|
|
|
|
var instance = new Combined();
|
|
|
|
instance.isInstance(Combined); // true
|
|
instance.isInstance(MixinOne); // true
|
|
instance.isInstance(MixinTwo); // true
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, there is no way to make 'instanceof' work with multiple
|
|
inheritance. To replace it, simply use the 'isInstance' method that gets added
|
|
to your instances. It will return true for any base object in the inheritance
|
|
tree.
|
|
|
|
Additionally, the 'super_' attribute is still present on the new constructor in
|
|
multiple inheritance but it only references the first prototype present in the
|
|
call to 'inherits'. It is provided only for compatibility with `util.inherits`
|
|
and, when using multiple inheritance, the 'super_' attribute should be avoided
|
|
in favour of calling the target prototype directly if the form of
|
|
`<Constructor>.prototype.<method>.call(this, ...)` or
|
|
`<Constructor>.prototype.<method>.apply(this, ...)`.
|
|
|
|
## You Said Something About Fast?
|
|
|
|
All inheritance libraries have their cost. When the overhead in question affects
|
|
the speed of object definition and creation, though, that cost must be kept
|
|
to a minimum. Here is how this library compares to the competition:
|
|
|
|
### Object Definition
|
|
|
|
The typical benchmark you will see while researching inheritance tools is one
|
|
that measures the cost of an object prototype, or class, definition followed by
|
|
the creation of a single instance. The following results are based on a test
|
|
which does just that. Each library produces an equivalent inheritance tree and
|
|
spawns an instance. The full source of the benchmark can be found in
|
|
'benchmarks/comparisons/define.js'.
|
|
|
|
The approximate results:
|
|
|
|
| Name | % Slower |
|
|
----------------|-------------
|
|
| Fiber | 0.0000 % |
|
|
| util.inherits | 24.010 % |
|
|
| augment | 64.601 % |
|
|
| Modelo | 65.594 % |
|
|
| Klass | 74.658 % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The [Fiber][] library is the clear winner with a 24% difference in run-time cost
|
|
from the Node.js 'util.inherits'. Considering the implementation of
|
|
'util.inherits' is effectively a two line wrapper around the 'Object.create'
|
|
built-in, it's quite a surprise that Fiber is *that* much faster. Now, the
|
|
*actual* difference between Fiber and 'util.inherits' is something on the order
|
|
of ~0.00008 seconds which, frankly, is inconsequential.
|
|
|
|
In fact, even the difference between Fiber and the bottom three libraries
|
|
is inconsequential, not because the difference is not statistically
|
|
significant but, because this benchmark only represents the time required to
|
|
define a "class", or object prototype. This is something that happens, at most,
|
|
once for each class, or object prototype, defined in a code base. These
|
|
run-time costs simply do not matter unless your code base generates hundreds
|
|
of thousands of "class" definitions.
|
|
|
|
### Instance Creation
|
|
|
|
A far more realistic measurement of overhead is the time it takes to create an
|
|
instance of an object defined using an inheritance library. After all, creating
|
|
instances necessarily happens far more often than defining the prototype:
|
|
|
|
| Name | % Slower |
|
|
----------------|-------------
|
|
| Modelo | 0.0000 % |
|
|
| util.inherits | 3.4355 % |
|
|
| Fiber | 45.017 % |
|
|
| augment | 48.284 % |
|
|
| Klass | 161.79 % |
|
|
|
|
The above results are deceptive. While it appears as though Modelo is faster
|
|
than the others, including the Node.js 'util.inherits', the reality is that
|
|
the run-time difference between these libraries is so small that it exceeds
|
|
the microsecond resolution of the timer used in the benchmarks. For all intents
|
|
and purposes there is no measurable difference between any of these libraries.
|
|
|
|
### Conclusion
|
|
|
|
When it comes down to it, you should pick your inheritance tool chain based on
|
|
its interface. The run-time cost of most inheritance libraries on the market
|
|
today is sub-microsecond and unlikely to affect the performance of your
|
|
code.
|
|
|
|
Note: If you find a flaw in any of the benchmarks used please open an issue on
|
|
GitHub.
|
|
|
|
## Setup
|
|
|
|
### Node.js
|
|
|
|
This package is published through NPM under the name 'modelo':
|
|
|
|
$ npm install modelo
|
|
|
|
Once installed, simply 'require("modelo")'.
|
|
|
|
### Browser
|
|
|
|
This module uses browserify to create a browser compatible module. The default
|
|
grunt workflow for this project will generate both a full and minified browser
|
|
script in a build directory which can be included as a ```<script>``` tag:
|
|
|
|
<script src="modelo.browser.min.js"></script>
|
|
|
|
The package is exposed via the global name 'modelo'.
|
|
|
|
### Tests
|
|
|
|
Running the ```npm test``` command will kick off the default grunt workflow. This
|
|
will lint using jslint, run the mocha/expect tests, generate a browser module,
|
|
and generate browser tests.
|
|
|
|
### Benchmarks
|
|
|
|
Running ```grunt benchmark``` will run the benchmarks discussed above. You can
|
|
optionally install the micro-time library (```npm install microtime```) to get
|
|
microsecond precision.
|
|
|
|
## License
|
|
|
|
This project is released and distributed under an MIT License.
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 2012 Kevin Conway
|
|
|
|
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
|
|
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to
|
|
deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the
|
|
rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
|
|
sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
|
|
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
|
|
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
|
|
|
|
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
|
|
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
|
|
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
|
|
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
|
|
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
|
|
FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
|
|
IN THE SOFTWARE.
|
|
|
|
## Contributors
|
|
|
|
### Style Guide
|
|
|
|
All code must validate against JSlint.
|
|
|
|
### Testing
|
|
|
|
Mocha plus expect. All tests and functionality must run in Node.js and the
|
|
browser.
|
|
|
|
### Contributor's Agreement
|
|
|
|
All contribution to this project are protected by the contributors agreement
|
|
detailed in the CONTRIBUTING file. All contributors should read the file before
|
|
contributing, but as a summary::
|
|
|
|
You give us the rights to distribute your code and we promise to maintain
|
|
an open source release of anything you contribute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Fiber]: <https://github.com/linkedin/Fiber>
|