mirror of
https://github.com/cse110-fa22-group29/cse110-fa22-group29.git
synced 2024-11-10 05:34:44 +00:00
update pipeline arch linting and unit testing ADRs
This commit is contained in:
parent
8450227035
commit
64a0aef48b
19
specs/adrs/111222-cicd-multiple-pipelines.md
Normal file
19
specs/adrs/111222-cicd-multiple-pipelines.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
# Use multiple CI/CD pipelines in parallel
|
||||
|
||||
- Status: accept
|
||||
- Deciders: Arthur Lu, Marc Reta
|
||||
- Date: 11 / 12 / 22
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision Drivers
|
||||
|
||||
- Need to perform many different CI/CD tasks
|
||||
- Need pipeline to be durable against any single failure
|
||||
|
||||
## Considered Options
|
||||
|
||||
- Single deep pipeline
|
||||
- Multiple short pipelines in parallel
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision Outcone
|
||||
|
||||
Chosen Option: Multiple short pipelines in parallel as any one failure will not prevent code from being developed and deployed.
|
19
specs/adrs/111222-jslinting-eslint.md
Normal file
19
specs/adrs/111222-jslinting-eslint.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
# Use eslint for JS linting framework
|
||||
|
||||
- Status: accept
|
||||
- Deciders: Arthur Lu, Marc Reta
|
||||
- Date: 11 / 12 / 22
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision Drivers
|
||||
|
||||
- Need linting to work with multiple style standards
|
||||
- Need linting to be fast and informative
|
||||
|
||||
## Considered Options
|
||||
|
||||
- JSLint
|
||||
- eslint
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision Outcome
|
||||
|
||||
Chosen Option: eslint for its low configuration complexity.
|
19
specs/adrs/111222-jsunittest-mocha.md
Normal file
19
specs/adrs/111222-jsunittest-mocha.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
# Use mocha for JS unit testing framework
|
||||
|
||||
- Status: accept
|
||||
- Deciders: Arthur Lu, Marc Reta
|
||||
- Date: 11 / 12 / 22
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision Drivers
|
||||
|
||||
- Need specification on how to write unit testing assertion statements
|
||||
- Need framework to perform unit testing quickly for immediate code feedback
|
||||
|
||||
## Considered Options
|
||||
- JUnit5
|
||||
- Jest
|
||||
- Mocha
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision Outcome
|
||||
|
||||
Chosen Option: Mocha because it was significantly faster to run than Jest (1s vs 30s), and can use a variety of assertion styles unlike JUnit5.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user